1 Chronicles 8:35

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And the sons of Micah were, Pithon, and Melech, and Tarea, and Ahaz.

Original Language Analysis

וּבְנֵ֖י And the sons H1121
וּבְנֵ֖י And the sons
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 1 of 6
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
מִיכָ֑ה of Micah H4318
מִיכָ֑ה of Micah
Strong's: H4318
Word #: 2 of 6
micah, the name of seven israelites
פִּית֥וֹן were Pithon H6377
פִּית֥וֹן were Pithon
Strong's: H6377
Word #: 3 of 6
pithon, an israelite
וָמֶ֖לֶךְ and Melech H4429
וָמֶ֖לֶךְ and Melech
Strong's: H4429
Word #: 4 of 6
melek, the name of two israelites
וְתַאְרֵ֥עַ and Tarea H8390
וְתַאְרֵ֥עַ and Tarea
Strong's: H8390
Word #: 5 of 6
taarea, an israelite
וְאָחָֽז׃ and Ahaz H271
וְאָחָֽז׃ and Ahaz
Strong's: H271
Word #: 6 of 6
achaz, the name of a jewish king and of an israelite

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Benjamin and Saul's failed kingship section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term בִּנְיָמִין (Binyamin) - son of the right hand is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting God's sovereign choice of leadership.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Benjamin's genealogy and Saul's lineage. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection